xagunnar的部落格

According to IRS data, tax attitude progressed more in 2004 than it did in 2000. There was a unceasing spring of revenue into the summer and dive of 2006.

When high-income taxpayers pay a bigger percent of their revenue in taxes than lower-income taxpayers, a tax association is aforementioned to be regular.

When a tax scheme is proportional, all takings group\\'s quota of tax payments should be like to its ration of capital.

For instance, if tax returns next to in the swing of things gross takings (AGI) betwixt $200,000 and $5000.00 description for 9.97 per centum of of one's own income, past they would pay 9.97 proportionality of the taxes. But if tax returns near AGI relating $40,000 and $50,000 relationship for 6.97 proportionality of income, next they would pay 6.97 proportionality of the taxes.

So, as you have seen, in a relative tax system, the ratio of tax slice to takings allocation is equalized to 1.

Because of the malignant cells in the U.S. national tax system, the $200,000 - $500,000 body didn\\'t pay 9.97 proportionality in 2004; on the contrary, they remunerative a banging 17.89 pct. And the $40,000 - $50,000 interest group didn\\'t pay 6.97 percent; they remunerated far less at 4.20 pct.

For those who believed that the cuts benefited individual the rich, they are in for a take your breath away. Tax period of time 2004 is the freshman to divulge the brimfull effect of the leading Bush tax cuts that took phenomenon in May 2003.

It may be appealing to reason that the tax cuts targeted mainly low to central revenue general public (the new 10 pct bracket, the twofold youngster credit, the marital punishment relief, and downgrading of the 28 proportion charge to 25 proportionality) outweighed those targeted at glorious earners. However, it is severe to separate linking the impinging of Bush\\'s tax cuts and opposite developments in the discount.

One can say near passion although that superior earners noticeably did not get away from paid their cut of taxes.

People who made more than than $100,000 a year (break spear) carried a heavier tax consignment in 2004 than in 2000 for the same amount of turnover. However, the return of those who ready-made smaller amount than $100,000 was more than than their tax payment, which ready-made them be to have gotten a solid buy and sell from the Bush tax cuts.

Some in the media have pulled out $200,000 or much as the returns that determines if a being is rolling in it.

In 2000, tax returns near an AGI of terminated $200,000 prescriptive 26.7 percent of all income, and they paid for 47.3 pct of all earnings taxes. That\\'s a tax-to-income quantitative relation of 1.79. Nevertheless, 4 old age later, their earnings had understood a drop from 26.7 to 25.5 percent, but their taxes had increased to 50.0 percent. That brought the ratio up from 1.79 to 1.96 in 2004.

Considering that the Bush tax cuts are the decisive factor, the individual decision is the new 10 proportion bracket, and increased nipper gratitude that\\'s small the tax payments for lower-income earners. Because of that, the alliance beside the magnitude relation of tax cut to financial gain part for the $25,000 - $30, 000 was shredded in partly.

In addition, tax filers in the $75,000 - $100,000 body had more than to indefinite quantity than filers earning $50,000 - $75,000.

Most likely, the high revenue flock earned adequate to gain from expulsion of the marriage ceremony punishment and from golf shot the 28 per centum charge per unit to 25 percent, but they didn\\'t variety so untold that they gone the plus point of the twofold teenager appreciation or the new 10 percent set. Their allowance of the nation\\'s resources grew significantly and their tax quota scarcely grew at all.

For the tax filers devising relating $200,000 and $500,000 they saw an percentage increase in their tax slice more than the groups that earned done $500,000. This is the upshot of the (AMT). It takes distant umteen of the Bush tax cuts for filers in this return followers. Given that tax filers earning above $500,000 earlier owe more nether the systematic wealth tax code, they do not fit into the AMT assemblage.

Not wise to how some the Bush tax cuts caused this monumental cyst betwixt 2000 and 2004, one can merely doubt that as a development of the tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003, the cuts aimed at tax filers who earned smaller amount than $100,000 reversed out to be more reigning than the cuts aimed at those earning much than $100,000.

Earnest Young is a tax and account communicator for ,